Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Polona Hercog vs Fangran Tian Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hercog vs Tian analysis and find out who is favored!
Polona Hercog vs Fangran Tian Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hercog 1 - 0 Tian
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hercog has won 45.12% of points on their second serve, while Tian has won 45.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hercog, in recent form, has won 53.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tian has won 66.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.32% and 40.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hercog has saved 54.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tian has saved 57.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hercog has won 64.38% of matches played (W/L 47/ 26), with Tian winning 67.39% (W/L 31/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hercog has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 317/ 149), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 111/ 140). Tian has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 44/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 20/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Hercog has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.2% of matches (W/L 47/ 24), where as Tian has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 26/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hercog winning 1 times and Tian being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hercog winning 2 and Tian winning 0. The last match between Hercog and Tian was at the W25 Vrnjacka Banja, 18-08-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Polona Hercog getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hercog and Tian have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hercog winning 0 times and Tian 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hercog winning 0, and Tian 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hercog has played against opponents with an average rank of 333.18 while Tian has played against players with an average rank of 154.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hercog has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tian has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hercog has converted 48.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tian has converted 50.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
183
Rank
35
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
490
Rank
452
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
58% (472-342)
Career Total W/L
71% (64-26)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
71% (5-2)
$2,403,410
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Polona Hercog vs Fangran Tian For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Hercog VS Tian
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Polona Hercog | Fangran Tian |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (25/51) | 72% (42/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (20/25) | 55% (23/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 50% (8/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (27/58) | 31% (16/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Polona Hercog
Player
Fangran Tian
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Polona Hercog | Fangran Tian |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 71% (5/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (43/31) | 69% (11/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (343/302) | 59% (85/58) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:7 | 1:56:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 358.26 | 270.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1258/2109) | 62% (328/533) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (814/1258) | 61% (201/328) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (384/851) | 46% (94/205) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (131/270) | 51% (38/75) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (976/2115) | 51% (228/446) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (21/13) | 71% (5/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (20/34) | 71% (5/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 50% (2/1) |
Polona Hercog Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Polona Hercog
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Polona Hercog
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Polona Hercog
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Polona Hercog
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Polona Hercog
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Pia Lovric
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
78%
(
58 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Nina Potocnik
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Fangran Tian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Fangran Tian
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Eudice Wong Chong
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Lara Pfeifer
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | bye | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ashley Lahey
Player
Fangran Tian
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Hanna Chang
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Wakana Sonobe
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Sofia Shapatava
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Fangran Tian
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Katherine Hui
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hercog Vs Tian Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hercog are available here and Tian photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
